Types and Forces of Change
10 January 2025
Figuring out your key forces and types of Change
Ever been involved in a change programme or initiative where people seem to be pulling in different directions?
Change is put simply moving from a current to a future state.
However, change is often not that simple to implement – change can be thwarted or resisted for a number of reasons whether its internal or external.
For example, people can often want to subvert or resist change and pull back to where you started or simply refuse to change.
As a leader, if you want your change ambitions and plans to be a success – a key aspect is figuring out what are the key forces at play that are or could impact change along with the type of change you are undertaking. See below the forces and types of change model a summary of managing the tensions between internal and external forces along with major transformative versus incremental change.
The forces of change
The forces of change can be external and internal. Both forces can bring benefits and risks. How you manage and respond to these forces matters with any change initiative.
External Forces
Factors such as political, economic, social, technological change or simply competition can force a business to change. As a leader identifying the external forces which have the biggest impact to your initiative could change over time; so, monitoring these forces and predicting any potential impact will help you to plan a smoother more successful implementation of your change plan:
- Political - Political forces can change many aspects of your change initiative – major elections in key countries can have huge ramifications across the globe if the political leadership changes. Depending on the nature, size, and complexity of the change you are undertaking newly elected political parties can force change - political party preferences can be beneficial and boost change or be detrimental by destroying change. Therefore, paying attention to, and anticipating any change in politics in the markets you operate can help you scenario plan and mitigate any risks.
- Economic – The economic impact of the markets within which you operate again can have a major impact on your change initiative. For instance, funding streams can open up or dry up depending on the state of the economy in the areas your organisation operates – so keeping a close eye on economic factors which can have a direct or indirect impact on your change programme is important.
- Social – The norms in a society may differ across your market base particularly if you operate on a global scale. As a leader, for example it is important to recognise ‘moments that matter’ or small steps in successful completion of change milestones. However, you need to pay close attention to how you reward people for positive progression along the change journey – as this may differ from region to region or country to country. The use of symbolism is a powerful tool in any change armoury, and it has been proven symbolism may assist in removing resistance to change and increasing the positive emotional attachment or mindset shift in moving towards change. Executive symbolism used in change can have an enormous impact, but its usage needs to be tried and tested i.e. again watch out for social norms i.e. what works and what does not with your employees.
- Technological - The force of technological change is causing major shifts in society, how we work, live, and exist from computers to mobile phones to artificial and cyber intelligence are but a few examples forcing change.
- Cyber security threat for instance presents huge risk. How we use technology to view cyber risk both from a prevention, detection, protection, and ongoing management can force significant changes to your business and therefore bring about change initiatives, such as how you manage your workflow, processes, and report issues up to Board level.
- Harnessing digital technology and using it to your advantage in any change initiative is a must – but also factoring into your initiative how you cater for those stakeholders who are wary of technology or unable to access or use digital technology. For instance, if you send out a survey to gather information for your change programme – does everyone have online access? Can people understand your survey i.e. is the language simple? Do you need to use voice recordings or face to face survey completion techniques as alternatives?
- Competition – competition can be a positive or negative force for your business but ignore it as a leader at your peril. How easy is it for competitors to leapfrog ahead of your change plans and will that have an impact? If the answer is ‘easy’ and ‘yes’ then you need to assess the time, effort, and value of your change plans. Many organisations have fallen foul of not understanding the competition, their products or new business models and ultimately its caused the demise of their business. However, competition can be healthy in forcing change for ‘good’ and for the ‘betterment’ of the organisation and its employees.
Internal Forces
Internal forces such as a change in leadership, strategy, or employee happiness, or business performance can trigger the need for change but also impact the direction of your change initiative whilst it is in flight.
- Strategy - A change in strategy is a catalyst for change. For example, having an AI strategy across your business can bring about change in governance, usage, and management in an organisation – and managing the ‘change’ as a result is key to success.
- Leadership - Another internal force that can have an impact on a change initiative is how the organisation and change is led. For example, a new leader in an organisation, can bring their own stamp of authority and view of change and therefore ‘do things’ differently. Leadership is a significant force in charting the course for change i.e. some leaders are happy with the status quo, and continue with the current change programme, some may stop or other leaders eager to make a mark start change anew.
- Employees - Employees are an internal force for change. If they are happy and ‘buy’ into the change, understand, participate, and see the benefits, the path of change should be relatively easy to follow. However unhappy staff can be unwilling to change, unwilling to participate and resistant to new ways of working. Unhappy staff may also be a ‘just cause’ for change, so finding champions within the organisation who can help shape and influence the change momentum. Regular communication and feedback from employees can give you actionable insight to make ‘timely’ change interventions.
The types of change
There are two types of change, which you often find in large organisations both can be employed as types of change:
Small incremental change
- This is small often easy quick business improvements limited in size, scale, and time.
- Small changes can be more effective in ‘convincing’ colleagues or employees of the benefits of change especially when ‘quick wins’ make a difference.
- It is the small moments that matter that can gradually build over time to amount to larger-scale change if the minor changes are added together to form part of a managed change strategy.
- Change method selection is important (such as a business improvement – continuous improvement change method) and can be a blend of methods.
Major transformative change
- This is huge scale often enterprise-wide major change in strategy, structure, workforce, performance, and process.
- Usually, this type of change is conducted in a large organisation over a number of years.
- Budgets and resources invested are significant in size, scope and scale.
- Change method selection is important and can be a blend of methods.
As a leader its important to understand the type of change which could be a blend of both transformative and incremental. This maybe obvious but too many change programmes fail because for example they under-estimate the size of the change, the budget required, or they do not employ effectively appropriate change methods, training or quality controls.
In Summary
As a leader, figuring out your external and internal forces of change is important, and this can influence the type of change you are undertaking i.e. major transformative change and or smaller incremental change.
Monitoring and managing the forces of and types of change can help mitigate any risks, build some contingency into your change plans and boost benefits.
In other words, you can get everyone to ‘pull in the same direction’ with some ‘rope’ to spare to manage any eventualities.
This is a snapshot into some of the considerations of change. As a leader, you may also find a fuller brief on the overall change journey see the ‘C’s for Change’ and a ‘C’s of Change’ checklist a useful additional tool to support your change programme.
At the Human Digital Collaborative, we can offer through our Business Consultancy, change experts who can understand your needs and see where we can help in your change journey.
Do reach out to us – the Human Digital Collaborative.com
Hollywood movies popularised the 007 Agent (courtesy of Ian Fleming, the author). Technology companies are popularising the AI Agent. If you have not heard of Artificial Intelligence Agents or the term Agentic AI, then you will do. AI Agents will become as commonplace as having an App on your phone. Just look at an AI Agent as a ‘coworker’ or ‘support worker’ or an ‘AI Collaborator.’ AI Agents can be seen as a helping hand. An AI agent who can perform various tasks which can help humans with their daily work from crunching numbers for example, to summarising vast amounts of complex information, to dealing with supply chains or handling detailed customer queries. Call your AI Agent what you wish, whether it is 007, 008, 009 or OBEE1, AI Agents already come in many shapes and sizes often hidden from plain sight functioning as part of your internal organisation’s processes, doing beneficial work. These AI Agents are trained to handle complex, multi-step tasks. These AI Agents differ from Chatbots. Chatbots are more basic in usage i.e. they use AI to simulate human conversation and provide information based on predefined rules or data sets such as set scripts. Chatbots often pop up on webpages helping with basic queries. However, if you have a more complicated query, you are often transferred to a human. An AI Agent uses large language models to perform complex interactions and multi-step tasks. In the future you will see AI Agents and Chatbots becoming more sophisticated with a blurring of lines between the two. Currently, AI agents are more powerful than Chatbots, in that AI Agents can perform actions without direct user input with varying degrees of capability. AI agents can be segmented into six simple categories: Simple reflex , likened to a human reflex action, these AI agents perform simple actions, responding to preset rules and conditions e.g. elevator control doors open, or close, responding to button presses. Goal based , AI agents are programmed to achieve key goals or outcomes e.g. data driven insights in healthcare diagnostics or AI Agents supporting human clinical coders with clinical coding. Learning , AI learning agents will learn continuously; they take their input from various sources e.g. ecommerce platforms handling concert ticketing will take input from demand patterns and competitor information and apply dynamic pricing. So, the price of tickets can go up if demand is high. Model based reflex AI Agents have a memory i.e. they retain a model of the environment, as well as understanding the current environment, which can help predict future action e.g. used in robotics across industry with sensors to avoid obstacles and plan alternative routes. Utility based – based on clear frameworks laid out by your organisation such as time, cost, quality, or an agent could in a car look at speed versus performance. A utility agent is dynamic, constantly learning and often operating in a complex environment it will weigh up options to achieve the best outcomes within the parameters given such as driving up revenue or performance. Hierarchical agents – AI agents use a structured chain of command to carry out tasks with an AI supervisor delegating sub tasks e.g. managing workflow tasks in Human Resources such as handling data extraction or form filling.
Have you checked your Cyber security resilience capabilities?
Beware the eyes of cyber - do you know who's looking?
Seeing & controlling the ‘C’s’ of Change
Transformation twists and turns? For anyone who has undertaken a transformation programme particularly a significant, complex, multi-faceted transformation you will know that there are many twists and turns to ensuring success, particularly if the journey is taken over a number of years. Key to good transformation planning is making sure you have the support of your stakeholders, the right people in place, and the right resources to make it happen whether that be for example budget or systems, they all need to work in harmony to keep the transformation alive and help pave your way to success. Holding regular reviews is also important i.e. looking back and looking forward, looking inward, as well as outward to make sure you are still on the right path, and you keep pace with the times. A good illustration of why transformation is important is by looking at a case of a well-known company who enjoyed many years of success, but then failed to transform quick enough with challenging consequences: Kodak. Eastman Kodak (commonly know as Kodak) was incorporated as a business in 1832, and it grew to be one of the leading manufacturers of film and cameras in the world. However, it failed to recognise the significant threat of other competitors particularly in its market’s-movement to digital. This is despite one of its own employees in 1975 developing the world’s first hand-held digital camera, and another employee four years later predicting that a shift to digital photography was inevitable. Kodak executives seemingly ignored the warning signs, the advice given, and sadly it started its transformation journey too late, as over a century later since it began, this once successful company had to file in 2012 for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection [1] in the United States. A massive decline for a brand and a business who at one time seemed untouchable in its market. A huge price to pay for taking time to transform. The story for Kodak however, is not all bleak, as Kodak can be applauded for its tenacity to stay in business. By 2016 it once again started to generate a profit by transforming and restructuring its business. There are many other business illustrations of failing to transform that I could cite, however Kodak is a memorable example of a business whose longevity unfortunately did not give it licence to move to transform at a slower pace. A number of key questions arise from this case study and perhaps take stock of your own organisation’s transformation journey: Would Kodak be more of a dominant brand for consumers nowadays if it had transformed its business earlier? If it had shifted its consumer film products and services earlier to digital? (it still has a film business with movies). Or if it had looked inward, recognising talent, and listening to employees in its own organisation? Or if it had looked outward and reacted faster to the competitor threats from Fujifilm or indeed the smartphone and device manufacturers? How the picture (pardon the pun!) may have been different today if such a dominant company with a very strong brand, had fine-tuned the twists and turns of transformation to its advantage? Transformation timing? We hear often from businesses – now is not a good time to transform, or we tried that, and it didn’t work, or those types of change (e.g. front or back- office administration process automation) works in that business sector but wouldn’t work in ours? Ask yourself are these just excuses for not taking bold steps to transform or are there genuine reasons for standing still in your organisation? The key question is can you really afford for your organisation to stand still? As a former CEO we know always said after implementing a successful transformation, ‘there’s more to do.’ In other words, his success was not going to be pinned to the mast of completing the last journey to improvement, but rather looking across the organisation to see how things could be improved further for its customers, its staff and its stakeholders.
Navigating the Cyber Pandemic in Healthcare
Can you see, feel, hear the difference Artificial Intelligence (AI) is making in your organisation? Does it feel real i.e. is it making a difference? There’s been much hype around AI and what it means. Every day something new seems to be happening as the pace picks up around the technology and the subtleties that go along with Artificial Intelligence. So how real is Artificial Intelligence for you and for your organisation? Firstly, to understand where you and your organisation are in the adoption of AI, let’s get to basics - what is AI? There are many variants of definitions out there, for us at the Human Digital Collaborative, Artificial Intelligence put simply is about computers and digital devices answering an ask or solving a problem you may have by drawing their answer from a large data source. In essence, the artificial intelligence looks up menus in its library to determine quick answers for you. There are other variants of AI e.g. such as Artificial General intelligence (more human-like, sentient) which with the advent of applications Chat GPT and Claude. AI is now multi-modal i.e. text, pictures, audio, video and code can be generated from multiple inputs. This broadens the use and capabilities of AI.
Welcome to the Human Digital Collaborative